I saw an article this morning on how society is to blame for gorilla mom not watching her kid. Don't worry...this article isn't on her. It's about the idea that zoos don't serve educational purpose. I disagree. Here why....
Trips to the zoo that include learning about the animals, whether self guided or field trip, may not directly influence conservation of an endangered species at that moment but it eventually does, for so many. As kids learn about the habitats of animals, they learn to respect and appreciate the contribution these animals make to our world. Many develop a passion from these field trips that might lead them to be a veterinarian, zoologist, or activist. The passion just isn't nearly as strong watching it on a live cam or reading a book. When a child goes on a field trip to the zoo, a seed is planted to learn, help and contribute in any way they can. Money from zoo sales go toward conservation efforts, continued education and stimulation of these creatures.
The idea that all zoo programs are bad is also misleading. While some animals are born in captivity, others were rescued. Some are being bred in zoos to prevent extinction due to poaching and destruction of their habitat. Like everything else, of course there are cons. However, the idea that some bad aspects should equal no zoos at all is a very abrupt way to view it.
Look...I'm all for avoiding circuses due to cruel practices. I'm not a fan of safari trophy hunts, personally but if we want the next generation to do better, we need to teach better and educating them at zoos can be a great tool.
No comments:
Post a Comment